What belongs in a conceptual model, what doesn't, and how it traces back to business objectives.
From Ultra Transcenders 2V0-13.25 by Tony Rough
Objectives 1.2 and 3.2 ask you to build a conceptual model from business objectives and to recognise one when you see it.
The conceptual model shows what the solution must achieve and for whom: its main capabilities, its consumers, the qualities it must deliver and the boundaries set by constraints. It is technology-agnostic: no product, model, size or address appears. Its audience is the business sponsor and stakeholders, and its purpose is agreement on scope before design work starts. Every element traces to at least one requirement or constraint.
To create one from a set of business objectives:
Take three objectives: deliver new services faster, keep trading if one metropolitan data centre is lost, and keep business units securely apart, plus two needs common to any platform: operational efficiency and security.
| Conceptual element | Traces to | Left for later |
|---|---|---|
| Self-service for VMs and containers | Faster delivery | Which product provides it |
| Two data centres in one metro area, both in use | Survive a data centre loss | Stretched clusters, witness site |
| Isolated environments per business unit | Separation | Domains, tenants, VPCs |
| Central monitoring and lifecycle | Operational efficiency | Deployment model and size of each appliance |
| Sign-in with corporate identities | Security | Identity broker and SSO models |
The design profile categories used by every VCF blueprint (consumption, physical site configuration, availability, isolation, recoverability, expansion) make a good checklist for the conceptual model, because most of their values describe outcomes: tolerating the failure of a single rack, tenant-to-tenant isolation, or recovery to a second site after a single site is lost. Comparing your conceptual model with the profiles narrows the blueprint choice. Consumption values that name products, such as VCF Automation, already belong to the logical design.
Common trap: Naming products or models in the conceptual model, such as “a vSAN stretched cluster across two sites” - that is a logical decision; the conceptual model says “workloads keep running if one data centre fails” and leaves the mechanism open.
This note is one section of Ultra Transcenders 2V0-13.25: VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Architect, an independent study guide that explains every topic the exam covers by technology, with comparison tables, diagrams and the common traps, plus a glossary linked to Broadcom TechDocs.
Free to read with Kindle Unlimited. Opens Amazon in a new tab.
About the book · 2V0-13.25 terms in the glossary · All 2V0-13.25 study notes
How to tell the five apart, what each obliges the architect to do, and worked classifications.
What each design quality means, with example requirements and the VCF 9.0 design choices that serve them.
How to record a design decision so it traces to a requirement and states its implications, the way VCF design elements do.
The requirements that call for a separate workload domain, and when another cluster in an existing domain is enough.
Prerequisites, latency and bandwidth limits, the vSAN witness, host counts and what fails over automatically.
Bulk, vMotion, Replication Assisted vMotion, Cold and OS Assisted Migration compared by downtime, scale and source platform.