The requirements that call for a separate workload domain, and when another cluster in an existing domain is enough.
From Ultra Transcenders 2V0-13.25 by Tony Rough
Capacity can grow by adding a cluster to an existing domain or by creating a new domain; the documented attributes of each make the choice mechanical once the driver is known. Figure 6.1 shows the questions that decide between the two.
A new workload domain brings a new vCenter and SSO domain, an independent lifecycle, optionally its own NSX instance and identity provider, and a separate ESX management VLAN and subnet (the ESX design recommends one per workload domain). Its costs land partly on the management domain (another vCenter appliance and possibly three NSX Manager nodes), partly on operations (another set of credentials and password rotations) and partly on the network team (more VLANs and subnets). The design library recommends workload domains for customer workloads in the first place, accepting the extra hardware.
A new vSphere cluster in an existing domain shares that domain’s vCenter, SSO domain, NSX instance and lifecycle, but brings its own:
| Requirement or driver | Design decision | Justification | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separate administrators or identity provider | New workload domain | Own vCenter SSO domain; dedicated IdP supported | More credentials; vCenter in management domain |
| Separate maintenance windows and versions | New workload domain | Independent lifecycle per domain | More lifecycle operations to schedule |
| Network or security isolation from other tenants | New workload domain with dedicated NSX | Own management plane and transport zone | Three NSX nodes in management domain |
| More capacity for existing tenants | New cluster in existing domain | No new vCenter, SSO or NSX | Shares domain lifecycle and NSX |
| Different availability level for some workloads | New cluster with another cluster model | Models are set per cluster | Model-specific host counts and VLANs |
| Different storage type or hardware | New cluster with its own principal storage | Principal storage is per cluster | Hosts commissioned for that storage type |
Scale limits also matter: the Workload Domain Models page gives up to 24 workload domains per VCF instance in addition to the management domain; the 25 in the vCenter design page’s SSO requirement counts the management domain’s vCenter as well.
Common trap: Creating a new workload domain whenever more capacity is needed - each domain adds a vCenter (and possibly an NSX Manager cluster) to the management domain plus separate credentials to rotate; when no isolation, identity or lifecycle driver exists, add a cluster to an existing domain.
This note is one section of Ultra Transcenders 2V0-13.25: VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Architect, an independent study guide that explains every topic the exam covers by technology, with comparison tables, diagrams and the common traps, plus a glossary linked to Broadcom TechDocs.
Free to read with Kindle Unlimited. Opens Amazon in a new tab.
About the book · 2V0-13.25 terms in the glossary · All 2V0-13.25 study notes
How to tell the five apart, what each obliges the architect to do, and worked classifications.
What belongs in a conceptual model, what doesn't, and how it traces back to business objectives.
What each design quality means, with example requirements and the VCF 9.0 design choices that serve them.
How to record a design decision so it traces to a requirement and states its implications, the way VCF design elements do.
Prerequisites, latency and bandwidth limits, the vSAN witness, host counts and what fails over automatically.
Bulk, vMotion, Replication Assisted vMotion, Cold and OS Assisted Migration compared by downtime, scale and source platform.